Square of z-component of angular momentum eigenvalues

tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm trying to demonstrate that if:

$$\hat{L}_z | l, m \rangle = m \hbar | l, m \rangle$$

Then

$$\hat{L}_z^2 | l, m \rangle = m^2 \hbar^2 | l, m \rangle$$

Homework Equations



$$\hat{L}^2 = \hat{L}_x^2 + \hat{L}_y^2 + \hat{L}_z^2$$
$$\hat{L}_z = -i\hbar \left [ x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right ]$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not really sure where to start with this. I can apply the operator ##\hat{L}_z^2## to an arbitrary function ##f(x,y)##, but that gives me:

$$\hat{L}_z^2 f(x,y) = \hbar^2\left(x^2 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} - xy \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} -xy \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial y} + y^2 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \right)f(x,y) $$
I've no idea if this demonstrates anything at all...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't think too complicated. Just apply \hat{L}_z twice to the eigenstate. Generally one can say that almost any calculation concerning angular-momentum operators is easier in the representation-free Hilbert-space formulation than using the differential operators of the position representation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top