SR Effects on Interstellar Probe: Can Messages Return in 50 Years?

dbmorpher
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
If a probe is sent to the Tau Ceti system and does not accelerate outside the solar system (keeps a constant velocity when passing the heliosphere) will it not experience relitivistic effects? Could it then send a message back to Earth in 50 years for us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All moving objects experience relativistic effects, but if the velocity is small (compared to the speed of light) those effects are small as well. Every probe can always send signals to us (unless it is REALLY far away (billions of light years)).
 
dbmorpher said:
If a probe is sent to the Tau Ceti system and does not accelerate outside the solar system (keeps a constant velocity when passing the heliosphere) will it not experience relitivistic effects? Could it then send a message back to Earth in 50 years for us?
You can use the Relativistic Doppler formula to calculate when the probe needs to send that message so that it will arrive on Earth 50 years after launch. Take its speed relative to Earth as a ratio of v/c = β and crank it into the formula:

√((1-β)/(1+β))

Then multiply that factor by 50 and that will tell you when the probe needs to send the message.

Here's a couple examples. First for a speed of 0.6c we calculate:

√((1-0.6)/(1+0.6)) = √(0.4/1.6) = √0.25 = 0.5

So the probe needs to send the message when its clock reads 0.5*50 = 25 years.

In this diagram, Earth is shown as the blue line with dots marking each year (same as the coordinate time since this is the Earth inertial rest frame). The probe is shown in black with yearly dots that are spaced farther apart corresponding to a Time Dilation factor of 1.25. At year 25 the probe sends the green message which travels at the speed of light along the 45-degree angle arriving at Earth time of 50 years.

attachment.php?attachmentid=56246&stc=1&d=1362165158.png


Lest you think this is obvious (the probe sends the message at one half the total time), let's do another one for 0.8c. In this case, the Doppler Factor is 0.333 so we have to multiply that by 50 to get 16.67 as the time the probe needs to send the message:

attachment.php?attachmentid=56248&stc=1&d=1362165570.png


If you think about it, the slower the probe goes, the closer to 50 years the probe has to send the message because it will get back to Earth very quickly. The faster it goes, the closer to 0 years it has to send the message because its clock is almost stopped in the Earth frame. In this case, the probe will send the message near the coordinate time of 25 years and the coordinate distance of 25 light-years. So it takes the probe about 25 years of Earth time to get to where it sends the message and it takes another 25 years for the message to get back to earth.
 

Attachments

  • Message to Earth at 0.6.PNG
    Message to Earth at 0.6.PNG
    4.1 KB · Views: 663
  • Message to Earth at 0.8.PNG
    Message to Earth at 0.8.PNG
    4.3 KB · Views: 497
Thanks George really informative!
Now just to get the grant...
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
190
Views
26K
Back
Top