Stability of Binary System with Anti-Particle Circulation in Quantum Physics

Will_C
Hi,
I have a question about anti-particle.
In the modern physics, we "know" (I don't think we really know it) the reason, why the shell electron did not collapse into its ion core, because of quantum theory.
But is it possible a electron "circulate" a positron without annihilation. Is there any possibility for such particle being stable?
Thx.
Will.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thx James,
Thank you for your suggestion and guiding. According to the website: "quantum field interactions between the positron and electron cause positronium to be unstable."
How does it work? Is there any simple concept to explaine this (I have not get start on QEM yet)?

Will.
 
A small part of the wave functions of the electron and positron overlap.
This leads to eventual annihilation of the pair, producing two, and more rarely three, photons.
 
Thx Meir!
When I pick up a textbook (modern physics), and look for the Schrödinger’s equation for Hydrogen atom. The equation of that is regardless anything about hydrogen (such as mass of hydrogen) except the charge. Thus, what I want is to replace the hydrogen with a positron and the Schrödinger’s equation doesn't any changes.
SO, is it too simple to counter with atom by QM?

Will.
 
You can use simple QM to get the WF, but you have to take into account the reduced mass of the particles. Just put in m/2.
Calculation of the annihilation rate needs QFT to convert the e-positron pair into photons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top