Standing wave with specific initial/boundary conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a wave equation with specific initial and boundary conditions. The first boundary condition, which requires the slope to be zero at x=0, only restricts the solution to D=0, allowing for C to remain unrestricted. The second boundary condition provides a value for k, confirming the presence of a standing wave. The participants clarify their understanding of the initial conditions, particularly how to interpret the delta function, which leads to a successful application of absolute value in the solution process. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting boundary conditions in wave equations.
Isow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isow said:

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
The Boundary condition, ∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0, only makes D = 0 with no restriction on C.
The other Boundary condition gives you k .

It's a standing wave. Right?

What are the conditions at nodes and at anti-nodes?
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!

edit: and yes, it's a standing wave.
 
Isow said:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!
You're very welcome.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top