Standing waves and maximum intensity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the distance between two loudspeakers and sound intensity, with maximum intensity occurring at a separation of 27.5 cm and zero intensity at 60.5 cm. The concept of standing waves is central, as the maximum intensity indicates constructive interference, while zero intensity suggests destructive interference. The reasoning presented suggests that 27.5 cm corresponds to half a wavelength, leading to a wavelength of 55 cm. However, the discussion indicates a need for further consideration of how moving the speakers affects the standing wave pattern. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
kathyt.25
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Two loudspeakers emit sound waves along the x-axis. The sound has maximum intensity when the speakers are 27.5 cm apart. The sound intensity decreases as the distance between the speakers is increased, reaching zero at a separation of 60.5 cm. What is the wavelength of the sound?"

I think this is more of a conceptual question that doesn't involve any actual calculation? I think it just involves an understanding of wavelengths and standing waves


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to work this one out, and this would be my reasoning, but it obviously doesn't fit in with the numbers given...
with my assumptions, I *should* be getting 1/2 wavelength = 27.5cm, and 1 wavelength = 55cm

So to work out this problem, I drew two sets of diagrams.
(1) The first diagram has speakers that are 27.5cm apart. Since this is when max intensity is generated, I figured that the antinode must be made in the middle, and that the waves shouldn't cancel out, and instead should be constructively superimposed - ie. added together without cancelling out. So in my diagram, the waves generated in this case make 1/2 a wavelength, which is 27.5cm.

(2) In the second diagram, Since this would be when intensity is zero, I thought that the two waves must cancel out... but still, this doesn't fit in with the assumption that the first case represents 1/2 wavelenght, and the second case represents a full wavelength
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would guess that you need to consider the situation slightly differently.

assuming you had the speakers set up to produce a standing wave, then moved one of them further away by one full wavelength, what would happen? what would happen as you moved the speaker?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top