shangriphysics
- 32
- 1
Do all standing waves have to have the same frequency and amplitude?
The discussion revolves around the conditions necessary for the formation of standing waves, specifically whether two transverse waves can have different frequencies and amplitudes while still producing a standing wave. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding wave interference and the characteristics of standing waves.
Participants express differing views on the conditions required for standing waves, with some asserting the necessity of equal frequency and amplitude, while others explore the implications of varying these parameters. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of non-pure standing waves.
Limitations include assumptions about wave behavior under varying conditions, dependence on definitions of purity in standing waves, and the complexity introduced by differing wavelengths and amplitudes.
That's right - but I'll be a tad more careful: if one wave had a bigger amplitude than the other, their velocities were equal and opposite, and their wavelengths were the same, then the antinode does not go to zero - but to the difference between the two amplitudes. Will the two waves always interfere to produce fixed nodes though? $$y(x,t)= A\sin k(x-vt) + B \sin k(x+vt) = \left[A\sin k(x-vt) + A\sin k(x+vt)\right] + (B-A)\sin k(x+vt)$$... see what I did there? The part in square brackets has a solution you already know.shangriphysics said:Ooo hmm, interesting interesting. I am having trouble seeing what a non pure standing wave would look like. Ex. If one wave had a bigger amplitude, then when they construct it would have an amplitude inbetween, but when they destruct, then the amplitude might never go to zero at the anti node.