Star moving through a cloud of particles

fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A star of mass M and radius R is moving with velocity v through cloud of particles of density \rho. If all the particles that collide with the star are trapped by it, show that the mass of the star will increase at a rate
\frac{dM}{dt} = \pi \rho v \left(R^2 + \frac{2GMR}{v^2}\right).


The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming the motion of the star is rectilinear, it's evident that in a time \Delta t the star will collide with all the particles in a cylinder of length v \delta t, which has mass \pi R^2 \pho v \Delta t. This gives the first term in the desired equation after division by v \Delta t.

As for the second term... I'm stuck. Here's what I've tried: Consider the particles in a 'slab' (of thickness dr) of the aforementioned cylinder a distance r away from the center of the star at the beginning of the time interval \Delta t. This slab will experience an acceleration GM/r^2. Hence, assuming it started from rest, it will travel a distance \frac{GM (\Delta t)^2}{r^2} in the time interval \Delta t. Et cetera. I don't know how to proceed from this point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi fluxions! :smile:

(have a pi: π and a rho: ρ and a delta: ∆ :wink:)

try it from the frame of reference of the star (with a wind of particles of velocity v), and use conservation of energy :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top