Starnge Recursion algorithm definition

xeon123
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
I'm reading the book "Algorithms Design" and a recursion algorithm is defined as:

T(n)\leqqT(n/q)+cn

But in the Karatsuba’s Algorithm, the recurrence for this algorithm is
T (n) = 3T (n/2) + O(n) = O(nlog2 3).

The last equation is strange, since 3T(n/2) is bigger than the set. Why they define like that?

(see pdf https://www.google.pt/url?sa=t&rct=...FrwVhGb_q1zQv1J8g&sig2=tNHJR-cfgZQBnihc7wckJQ)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I get the solution. The solution is related to the problem.

The karatsuba algorithm is a faster way to multiply 2 numbers. It splits the numbers in 2 halves.

The halves of the numbers is composed in the following equation:

XY = ac2^n + (ad + bc)2^n/2 + bd.

This equation is split in 3 subproblems: ac, bd, (a − b)(c − d).

So, the recurrence of the algorithm will become

T(n) = 3T(n/2) + cn
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top