State Vectors of a Sum of Hamiltonians

harrydent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm reading from my textbook "Foundations of Quantum Physics," and came across a statement that sounds trivial but I don't know how to prove. The passage can be found at http://books.google.com/books?id=3rxOHtn85qcC&pg=PA289#v=onepage&q=&f=false".

Because the particles do not interact, the Hamiltonian is the sum of individual Hamiltonians, one for each particle... The eigenkets are products of the individual eigenkets and the total energy is the sum of the energy eigenvalues of the particles.

Does anyone have any information on the proof of this theorem?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe someone could just explain it in plain English rather than a proof?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top