Static magnetic field from time-varying electric field

AI Thread Summary
A time-varying electric field does not necessarily create a time-varying magnetic field, as demonstrated by Ampere's law, which allows for static magnetic fields under certain conditions. The discussion highlights that while Maxwell's equations must be considered together, a static magnetic field can coexist with a time-varying electric field if specific conditions are met, such as a linear time-dependency of the electric field components. Examples provided suggest that a conservative electric field can exist alongside a static magnetic field, challenging the assumption that time variation in one field mandates variation in the other. The conversation also notes that sinusoidal variations in electric and magnetic fields typically lead to corresponding sinusoidal variations in the other field. Overall, the relationship between time-varying electric fields and static magnetic fields remains complex and context-dependent.
EmilyRuck
Messages
134
Reaction score
6
Hello!
In this thread, in this answer, my statement "A time-varying electric field creates a magnetic field which is time-varying itself" was refuted.

ZapperZ said:
Actually, this is not correct.

From Ampere's law, the curl of B is proportional to the time rate of change of E (and current density if there's one). But this curl of B need not have a time varying solution as well. It can easily be a magnetostatic field.

Zz.

Because I never observed this before, I would like to discuss about it. As far as I know, Maxwell's equations are valid always together, that is contemporary. Suppose that impressed currents are 0 and that we are in a linear, homogeneous medium. So, yes, Ampère's law does not cause a variation for the magnetic field

\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \epsilon \displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

but the co-existence of this equation with

\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = - \mu \displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t}

implies that, when one field (the electric one or the magnetic one) varies with time, it will create the other, varying with time too.
If it is incorrect, could you give me a more clear explanation? And could you give an example of a time-varying electric field which creates a static magnetic field?
Thank you anyway,

Emily
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0## does not always imply that ##\mathbf{E}=0##.
 
Consider the field induced from ##E=(kt,0,0)##
 
  • Like
Likes EmilyRuck
Consider ##\mathbf{E} = A_0t\hat{x}## and ##\mathbf{H} = \epsilon A_0 (z\hat{y} + 2y\hat{z})##, it should satisfy the two Maxwell equations with the curl.
 
  • Like
Likes EmilyRuck and Dale
Thank you both. Your examples provide a static magnetic field.
The requirements seem to be (observing \nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \epsilon \partial \mathbf{E} / \partial t):
- a constant \partial \mathbf{E} / \partial t and so a linear time-dependency for the \mathbf{E} components.
But this will imply (observing \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = - \mu \partial \mathbf{H} / \partial t = 0):
- a field \mathbf{E} which is still conservative.
Are these necessary and sufficient conditions for having a static magnetic field with a time-varying electric field?

Another important case is the sinusoidal one. But I think the above requirements could never be satisfied with that time-variation. At least in this case, a (sinusoidal) time-varying electric-field always produces a (sinusoidal) time-varying magnetic field and vice-versa.
Is it right or are there some other exceptions?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top