Statically Indeterminate Systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a composite shaft made of brass and steel, focusing on the axial stresses in the components during a tensile test. Participants explore the relationships between stress, strain, and deformation in a statically indeterminate system, addressing the complexities of solving for unknown forces and extensions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the problem and the equations of equilibrium, noting the challenge of having too many unknowns to solve for stress in each rod.
  • Another participant asserts that the stress in each part of the rod will be the same, assuming equal force and area, which is contested by others.
  • A participant questions the assumption of equal areas, pointing out the different diameters of the rods, which leads to a request for clarification on the dimensions.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the diameters of the rods, emphasizing the need to know the force applied to proceed with the calculations.
  • One participant expresses confusion about rearranging formulas to isolate the force, indicating a struggle with the unknowns in the problem.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the formula used and suggests rearranging it to solve for displacement, indicating a method to approach the problem with two equations and two unknowns.
  • A participant describes their understanding of the structure of the composite shaft and the equations for deformation, but expresses uncertainty about the next steps to solve for the unknowns.
  • Finally, a participant summarizes the equilibrium condition and suggests a method to solve for the force using the total change in length equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the assumptions regarding stress and area in the different parts of the composite shaft. There is ongoing debate about the correct approach to solving for the unknowns, with multiple perspectives on how to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of equilibrium equations and the relationships between stress, strain, and deformation. The problem involves multiple unknowns, including the force applied and the extensions of each component, which complicates the resolution.

skaboy607
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A composite shaft consists of a brass bar 50mm in diameter and 200mm long, to each end of which are concetrically friction-welded steel rods of 20mm and 100mm long. During a tensile test to check the welds on the composite bar, at a particular stage the overall extension is measured as 0.15mm. What are the axial stresses in the bar given that Ebrass=120Gpa and Esteel=208 Gpa.

Homework Equations



Equations of equilibrium
Equations to describe the geometry of deformation
Stress-strain relationships.

The Attempt at a Solution



For the bar, the equations of equilibrium is that the total force is the same as force exerted on steel bar and brass bar.

The overall change in length must the sum of the change in rod 1 (steel), rod 2(brass) and rod 3(steel).

Stress strain equations are: E=Stress/Strain for each rod (material)

Ive got this far but there seem to always be too many unknowns in the problem to solve for stress in each rod?

Many thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the force in each part of the rod ,and the area of each part of the rod, is the same, then the stress in each part will be the same.
 
How can the area in each part of the rod be the same? They have different diameters, so surely they will have different cross sectional areas.
 
I assumed they were the same diameters because you did not list them. What are they? If known, you can proceed in the same manner, noting that the force in each part of the rod is the same, and the stress in each part is just P/A. You need first to solve for P. Note that your equation [tex]\sigma = \epsilon E[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\Delta = PL/AE[/tex].
 
If we are talking about the same thing, then the two diameters are given above, 50mm and 20mm. The problem is I am not given the force that is loaded in tension on the bar?
 
skaboy607 said:
If we are talking about the same thing, then the two diameters are given above, 50mm and 20mm. The problem is I am not given the force that is loaded in tension on the bar?
Is this the way the problem statement should read
A composite shaft consists of a brass bar 50mm in diameter and 200mm long, to each end of which are concetrically friction-welded steel rods of 20mm in diameter[/color] and 100mm long...?
After confirming this, then compute the extension of each part of the rod in terms of P, add em up, and set them = to the given total extension, and solve for P. Then solve for the stress in each part.
 
Yes sorry, it should have read 'diameter'.

ok, I got as far getting what I think are formula's for doing this but there are two many unknowns which is what I can't get my head around. The fomulae for each individual part that I got was F/A=E*(extension/length). If I rearrange for extension, I still have an unknown which is the force?

Am I understanding this right or being a bit stupid?

Thanks for your help.
 
Your formula is correct. It's the same one PhantomJay listed. The point now is to rearrange for displacement, fill them into your compatibility equation and then solve this together with your equilibrium equation. Two equations, two unknowns.
 
ok...I have done some more but come across some more confusion. From the question, I read that the bar consists of three parts. One center piece made material 1 and then two out pieces of the same diameter, length and material 2. From this I got that my deformation eq would be: total change in length=change in length 1 + change in length 2 + change in length 3. So after substitution of my stress-strain eq's, I would have total change in length=(F/A=E*(extension/length))'Piece1'+(F/A=E*(extension/length))'Piece 2'+(F/A=E*(extension/length))'Piece 3'.

Now if this is correct, I don't know what to do next! Unknowns are F and extension for each of the pieces. My equilibrium eq is F=F1=F2=F3 but how do I use this to solve?
 
  • #10
Since F1=F2=F3=F, then the sum of the deltas for each piece, F(L1)/A1E1 + F(L2)/A2E2+ F(L3)/A3E3, is equal to 0.15 mm. Solve for F.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
30K
Replies
1
Views
7K