Statics and equilibrium - asking for some guidance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a statics problem involving a figure supported at points A and B, with internal forces at joint C. Participants are seeking guidance on resolving discrepancies in their calculations of the forces at these points, specifically F_A, F_B, and F_C, as well as clarifying the application of sign conventions in their equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach to solving the problem, including the equations derived from moments about points A and B.
  • Another participant questions the use of negative signs in the equations for C_Bx and C_By, suggesting that the positive x-direction is to the right and the positive y-direction is upward.
  • A participant defends their use of negative signs by explaining their assumption of direction and the nature of internal forces at joint C.
  • There is a discussion about the consistency of mathematical treatment of signs, with one participant suggesting that if the mathematics is consistent, a variable can have a "wrong" sign that will resolve itself when the value is calculated.
  • Participants inquire about the method of substituting values between equations, specifically whether C_Ax is set equal to C_Bx or to its negative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of signs in their equations and the assumptions made regarding the directions of forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to these aspects.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the directions of forces and the treatment of internal forces, which may affect the participants' calculations and interpretations.

Finn J
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi,

I'm not used to communicate physics in English, so my language may be a bit off.

This task is fairly simplistic. It's a figure which is held up in points A and B (both having an x and y force exerted on them), and the figure has a joint C. It is depicted in attached files.

The answers are supposed to be F_A = 13,00 kN, F_B = 7,85 kN, F_C = 9,88 kN.

My results are erroneous.

Can anyone please give me some guidance?

Here's my process:

I separate A-C from B-C and get C with internal forces with equally large opposing forces.

Figure A-C:

Sigma M_A (clockwise is +) = 0

5*2 + 10*2 - 4*C_Ay + 4*C_Ax = 0

=> 30 - 4C_Ay + 4C_Ax = 0, this is (1)

Figure B-C:

Sigma M_B (clockwise is +) = 0

(- cos(arctan(3/4)) * 12 * 2,5) - (sin(arctan(3/4)) * 12 * (tan(arctan(3/4)) * 2,5)) - C_Bx * 3 - C_By *4 = 0

- 37,5 - 3C_Bx - 4 C_By = 0, this is (2)I find an expression for one of the missing values, and put this in the other formula.

And my result is wrong. Always wrong for these tasks. I must do some fundamental error. Any help will be appriciated.
2.jpg
2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 605
Physics news on Phys.org
Finn J said:
Sigma M_B (clockwise is +) = 0

- 37,5 - 3C_Bx - 4 C_By = 0, this is (2)

Why are you using negative signs in front of C_Bx and C_By?

Isn't the positive x-direction to the right and the positive y-direction upward?
 
Because C has internal forces and I assumed direction. Both of which work against momentum. On the other figure there's opposite forces in C. Or am I wrong?
 
Finn J said:
Because C has internal forces and I assumed direction. Both of which work against momentum. On the other figure there's opposite forces in C. Or am I wrong?
There are various ways to treat signs. If your mathematics is completely consistent then a variable representing an unknown force can be given the "wrong" sign and when you obtain it's value, it will be a negative number. The simplest way to be consistent is to give forces pointing in the positive x or y direction a "+" sign.

I find an expression for one of the missing values, and put this in the other formula.
How are you doing that? Are you setting C_Ax = C_Bx or are you setting C_Ax = - C_Bx ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K