Statistical Analysis - Maximum Likelihood Fit

knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a set of data from the DAMA experiment in which a detector attempted to measure collisions with 'WIMP's [Weakly Interacting Massive Particles] as a candidate for dark matter. The detector records the time in days of a collision event. After binning the data and performing a Chi sqared test to a sine function I need to perform an 'Unbinned Maximum Likelihood Fit'.

As I understand the maximum likelehood fit is calculated using the probability distribution function (which i think is poissonian) for each data point.
After this I'm at a loss. Could anyone perhaps decribe the steps involved or even point me in the direction of a good guide to this test?

Thanks

Homework Equations



Poissonian PDF:

p(k,\lambda) = \frac{\lambda^k e^{-\lambda}}{k!}

k - observed # of events
λ - expected # of events

(However, Surely the data needs to be binned for a poissonian distribution to apply at all?)


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I don't think this was very clear. I have done some more reading:

My likelihood function L(λ) is poissonian:

f(k;\lambda)=\frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^k}{k!}

Log Likelihood function is:

L(\lambda)=ln\left(\Pi_{i}^{n} f(k_i;\lambda)\right)

Heres where i get a bit lost, I think my expected value λ should be a periodic function of the form:

\lambda_i(\omega,t_0;t_i)=cos(\omega[t_i-t_0])

The remaining steps (i think) are to substitute λ into the likelihood function and then to minimize the expression:

y=-2L(\lambda)

with respect to ω and t_0.

Does this sound right? Here's the expression i get:

L(\lambda)=-\Sigma_i^n cos(\omega[t_i - t_0]) + \Sigma_i^n k_i ln(cos(\omega[t_i - t_0]) - \Sigma_i^n ln(k_i !)

if my data is unbinned, what is my measured value (ki)? I don't think the detector records more than one count in a day, so could i make my effective bin size 1 day? this would eliminate the final term (as 0! = 1! = 1, and ln(1) = 0) giving:

L(\lambda)=-\Sigma_i^n cos(\omega[t_i - t_0]) + \Sigma_i^n k_i ln(cos(\omega[t_i - t_0])
(although this would disappear when minimizinag anyway)

after some rearranging and minimising with respect to omega i find:

\Sigma_i^n \frac{k_i}{cos(\omega[t_i-t_0])}=1

which implies:

\Sigma_i^n cos(\omega[t_i-t_0]) = 1

as k_i is only non zero when we observe a detection.

Does any of this look right? I've never done one of these before and examples of this type are difficult to find.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top