Statistical physics: counting states, entropy and temperature

EricTheWizard
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I've hit a bit of a snag with part c of this problem (can't figure out how to invert a function T(ν)), so I'm starting to question whether I have the previous parts correct.

Homework Statement


Consider a system of N identical but distinguishable particles, each of which has a
nondegenerate ground state with energy zero, and a g-fold degenerate excited state with
energy ε > 0.

(a) Let the total energy of the system be fixed at E = Mε, where M is the number of
particles in an excited state. What is the total number of states (E,N)?
(b) What is the entropy S(E,N)? Assume the system is thermodynamically large. You
may find it convenient to define ν ≡ M/N, which is the fraction of particles in an
excited state.
(c) Find the temperature T(ν). Invert this relation to find ν(T).
(d) Show that there is a region where the temperature is negative.
(e) What happens when a system at negative temperature is placed in thermal contact
with a heat bath at positive temperature?

Homework Equations


entropy: S(E,N) = k \ln \Omega (E,N), where \Omega is the number of states with energy E and particle number N.

temperature: \frac{1}{T} = (\frac{\partial{S}}{\partial{E}})_{V,N}

Stirling's approximation: k! ≈ \sqrt{2\pi k}e^{-k}k^{k}

The Attempt at a Solution


a) A particle can be in either the ground state or one of g excited states, so the number of states with excited particle number M should be \Omega(M,N) = {{N}\choose{M}} g^M because there are {N}\choose{M} ways to arrange which particles in an ensemble are excited, and then g choices for each particle of which degenerate state they're in. This seems to make sense to me, anyways.

b) To find the entropy, simply take the natural logarithm of Ω (which requires you to make Stirling's approximation so that you can pull parts of the factorials through the log)
S = k \ln\Omega ≈ k \ln{(\frac{N^{N+1/2}g^M}{\sqrt{2\pi}(N-M)^{N-M+1/2}M^{M+1/2}})} = k[(N+1/2)\ln N + \frac{E}{\epsilon}\ln g - \frac{1}{2}\ln(2\pi)-(N-\frac{E}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2})\ln{(N-\frac{E}{\epsilon})}-(\frac{E}{\epsilon}+\frac{1}{2})\ln{\frac{E}{ε}} ]

c) Now find the temperature distribution T(\nu) making the substitution \nu = M/N = E/N\epsilon, the fraction of particles in the excited state and using the formula for temperature given above.
\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial E} = \frac{k}{\epsilon}[\ln g + \ln(N - E/\epsilon) + \frac{N-E/\epsilon+1/2}{N-E/\epsilon}-\ln\frac{E}{\epsilon}-(1-\frac{\epsilon}{2E})] = \frac{k}{\epsilon}[\ln\frac{g(1-\nu)}{\nu}+\frac{1}{2N}\frac{2\nu-1}{\nu (1-\nu)}] = \frac{1}{T(\nu)}
Now this is the part I'm stuck at; I simply can't invert T(ν) because it's not a 1-to-1 function. If you plot it in Mathematica or similar, you get something like this:
JFkiV.jpg

which (and you can't see this very well) turns downward near ν=1 very sharply and makes the distribution non-invertible (at least in the negative temperature zone). Have I made a mistake somewhere?

d) Set T<0 and solve for the pertinent conditions (haven't tried this yet)

e) Heat will flow from a negative temperature system to a positive temperature one if they come in contact.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EricTheWizard said:
\frac{k}{\epsilon}[\ln\frac{g(1-\nu)}{\nu}+\frac{1}{2N}\frac{2\nu-1}{\nu (1-\nu)}] = \frac{1}{T(\nu)}

Just a thought: Can you ignore the second term on the left if you assume N is large?
 
TSny said:
Just a thought: Can you ignore the second term on the left if you assume N is large?

You're right; the problem does say to assume the system is thermodynamically large (N order of 10^23 or whatever). Sounds like a valid strategy (and makes the answer \nu(T)=\frac{g}{e^{\epsilon/kT}+g}).

Thanks for the inspiration!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top