A Statistical physics : Irreversibility

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of irreversibility in thermodynamics, particularly in relation to single or few-particle systems. It highlights that while a hydrogen atom can transition from an excited to a ground state, the reverse process is statistically less probable due to entropy considerations. The background electromagnetic field plays a crucial role in this context, providing a thermal environment that influences the atom's behavior. The second law of thermodynamics is emphasized, stating that entropy in isolated systems tends to increase, which aligns with the statistical mechanics framework. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of applying thermodynamic principles to systems with very few particles.
dontknow
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
The Entropy of an isolated always increases.
I was reading mehran kardar (books and lectures) it says the concept of irreversibility comes from an assumption (in which we increase the length scale by interaction disctance between two particles).
So My question is the concept of irreversibility is still valid in the case of 1 particle.

Let's take an example from Feynman 2nd volume; A hydrogen atom going from excited to ground state is more probable thing to happen than a de-excited electron get excited by a photon. His explanation is that for an excited state initially entropy is low because photon (in final state) is something that is wandering in different direction so there is an increase in entropy.

Coming back to question where does the explanation for irreversibility come for the case of 1 or few particle system.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dontknow said:
A hydrogen atom always goes from excited to ground state, not the other way.
Hmm, that doesn't seem right. A hydrogen atom clearly can go from the ground state to the excited state too.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
dontknow said:
Coming back to question where does the explanation for irreversibility come for the case of 1 or few particle system.

The single atom is interacting with many other things that are not explicitly mentioned, such as the quantum state of the electromagnetic field surrounding the atom. The background electromagnetic field can provide a thermal bath for the atom.

The background section (first paragraph) of https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04745v1 has some related references.

Chapter 3 of https://www.uibk.ac.at/th-physik/cqed/theses/bachelorthesis_kruckenhauser_andreas.pdf models spontaneous emission by coupling the atom to the background electromagnetic field.
 
Last edited:
dontknow said:
Summary:: The Entropy of an isolated always increases.
Coming back to question where does the explanation for irreversibility come for the case of 1 or few particle system.

Maybe, Feynman's reasoning can be easier understood when one conceptually explains “entropy” qualitatively in the following way:

The second law of thermodynamics says that energy of all kinds in our material world disperses or spreads out if it is not hindered from doing so. Entropy is the quantitative measure of that kind of spontaneous process: how much energy has ‘flowed’ from being localized to becoming more widely spread out (at a specific temperature). [Quotation marks by LJ]

Frank L. Lambert in “Entropy Is Simple — If We Avoid The Briar Patches!” (http://entropysimple.oxy.edu/content.htm#increase)

Thermodynamic processes entail spatial redistributions of internal energies, namely, the spatial spreading of energy. Thermal equilibrium is reached when energy has spread maximally; i.e., energy is distributed equitably and entropy is maximized.

Harvey S. Leff in “Removing the Mystery of Entropy and Thermodynamics – Part I” (Phys. Teach. 50, 28 (2012))

Feynman (in “Feynman lectures Vol. III”, Chapter 7.1) puts it in the following way:

Why does an atom radiate light? The answer has to do with entropy. When the energy is in the electromagnetic field, there are so many different ways it can be—so many different places where it can wander—that if we look for the equilibrium condition, we find that in the most probable situation the field is excited with a photon, and the atom is de-excited. It takes a very long time for the photon to come back and find that it can knock the atom back up again.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
The whole subject of thermodynamics including the 2nd law, is based on statistical mechanics. You can't apply statistics to 1 or 2 particles. You can't define temperature or entropy for 1 or 2 particles.

For example, what is the temperature of a free electron? There is no answer, the concept of temperature does not apply to a single particle.

Indeed, at the atomic level where we track every particle, almost all (not all but almost all) are time reversible.
 
Dale said:
Hmm, that doesn't seem right. A hydrogen atom clearly can go from the ground state to the excited state too.
Indeed, and in equilibrium the rate of excitation is the same as that of the relaxation.

The H theorem (increase of entropy) follows from the unitarity of the S matrix and Boltzmann's "molecular-chaos assumption" to truncate the BBGKY hierarchy in the usual way by approximating the two-particle phase-space distribution function with the product of the corresponding single-particle distribution functions.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
anorlunda said:
You can't define temperature or entropy for 1 or 2 particles.
...
There is no answer, the concept of temperature does not apply to a single particle.

For sure?
What about the average over time (ergodicity)?
In statistical mechanics temperature is an average kinetic energy.
 
rentier said:
For sure?
What about the average over time (ergodicity)?
In statistical mechanics temperature is an average kinetic energy.
Then you don't have a single particle, but an individual particle interacting with a reservoir.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
rentier said:
For sure?
What about the average over time (ergodicity)?
In statistical mechanics temperature is an average kinetic energy.
Sure, you can define temperature for a single particle coupled to a heat bath. Look for Fokker-Planck and/or Langevin equation.
 
  • Like
Likes rentier
  • #10
anorlunda said:
Indeed, at the atomic level where we track every particle, almost all (not all but almost all) are time reversible.

What is an example for _not_ reversible? (in statistical mechanics, not quants)
 
Back
Top