Statistical thermodynamics - mean energy of a nonlinear oscillator

galactic
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a classical one-dimensional nonlinear oscillator whose energy is given by \epsilon=\frac{p^{2}}{2m}+ax^{4}

where x,p, and m have their usual meanings; the paramater, a, is a constant

a) If the oscillator is in equilibrium with a heat bath at temperature T, calculate its mean kinetic energy, the mean potential energy, and mean total energy (it is not necessary to evaluate any integrals explicitly)

b) Consider a classical one-dimensional oscillator whose energy is given by \epsilon= \frac{p^{2}}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}kx^{2}+ax^{4}.

In this case the anharmonic contribution ax^{4} is very small. What is the leading contribution of this term to the mean potential energy? (Recall that for small u, e^{u}~ 1 + u

The Attempt at a Solution



This relates to information in Gould and Tobochnik Chapter 6 (statistical and thermal physics). I have no idea how to approach this problem, and any guidance or thought provoking questions to help me get started would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First think about, what's the phase-space distribution function in thermal equilibrium! Then it's pretty easy to evalute the mean values (although the integrals for the potential energy for the x^4 are not doable in closed form with elementary functions).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top