Courses Stay on Theoretical Physics course or switch to Maths & Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision between continuing with a Theoretical Physics course or switching to a joint honours Maths & Physics program at Durham University. The individual is considering a PhD in theoretical physics and has received advice suggesting that the Maths & Physics route may provide a stronger mathematical foundation, which is beneficial for theoretical studies. Participants in the discussion emphasize that the Maths & Physics program offers a more rigorous and comprehensive curriculum, potentially making the physics concepts more intuitive. There is also a consensus that many modules overlap between the two programs, but the Maths & Physics course includes additional mathematical physics options not available in the Theoretical Physics course. The individual plans to take their time before making a decision, as the transfer is not possible until October.
Mithra
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I know this is predominately an american centred forum but I was wondering if anyone could give me some advice. I've completed the first year of a Theoretical Physics 4 year course at Durham (in the UK). However with the modules that I chose I do still have the option to swap over to "Maths & Physics" joint honours which is half modules from maths and half from physics departments. If I do carry on to a PhD, which is something at the moment I am seriously considering (though I know things will change a lot in the next 3 years) as far as I can tell I would definitely like to do it in a more 'theoretical' branch of physics rather than a directly experimental one.

I have heard from several sources that doing the Maths & Physics would be a far better preparation for this than the theoretical physics as it gives you a more rigorous understanding of the mathematical basis etc. this is largely from a research student who is doing an MSc next year but says he has spoken to "lots of professors and researchers" so not exactly authoritative but not to be ignored either.

tldr: Could someone advise me on which of these two courses would give the best 'grounding' if I were to continue on and do a PhD in a more theoretical physics area.

Maths & Phys:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/natural.sciences/prospective/msci-maths-phys/"

Theoretical Phys:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/physics/undergraduate/courses/details/
(sorry for the ambiguity of that one, their pdf which shows the course specifically is down at the moment, it is F344 in the table)

Any advice would be amazing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both programs look extremely strong but by looking at the course content it appears the Mathematics and Physics route is more comprehensive and rigorous which is how graduate Physics is taught and the Mathematics will make the Physics more intuitive, I would go into that program.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
Both programs look extremely strong but by looking at the course content it appears the Mathematics and Physics route is more comprehensive and rigorous which is how graduate Physics is taught and the Mathematics will make the Physics more intuitive, I would go into that program.

Thanks for the advice, looks like I shall have to look into transferring course!
 
I think you should wait for other opinions, many people may have different perceptions on these topics that should be considered.
 
I'd go for the Maths and Physics. It seems like a lot of the modules are taken in both courses anyway, but there is a wide selection of mathematical physics courses you can choose from in the maths&phys degree that don't seem to be available in the theoretical physics course.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
I think you should wait for other opinions, many people may have different perceptions on these topics that should be considered.

I can't transfer until October so I won't be rushing into it, don't worry :wink:.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top