Steady state conduction in a hollow sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a conduction problem involving a hollow sphere with specific dimensions and temperatures. The user calculated the heat transfer rate but arrived at a value that is half of the expected answer. The key issue identified is in the substitution of the inner and outer radii in the equation. The correct formulation should involve the term (1/ri - 1/ro) in the denominator. The user is advised to adjust their calculations accordingly to achieve the correct result.
rcummings89
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm having trouble with a conduction problem, I have access to the answer but not the solution. I did it on my own and my value is half of what the answer is. Now, my calculus is a little rusty, but I don't know where I am going wrong. So the dimensions and temperatures of the sphere are:

ri=0.01 m
ro=0.02 m
Ti=70 oC
To=100 oC
k=0.58 W/m K

Attempt:

q/A = -k dT/dr

q/A dr = -k dT

Where A = 4\pir2 then

q ∫ dr/r2 evaluated from ri to ro = -4 \pi k ∫ dT from Ti to To yields...

-q (ro-1 - ri-1) = -4 \pi k (To - Ti)

Substituting in the values, I get q = 4 \pi [(0.58)(100-70)](0.02-0.01) = 2.18 W

The actual answer is double that and negative, -4.37 W. Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your algebraic solution is correct, but you substituted into it incorrectly. The problem is with the ro and ri. You should have (1/ri-1/ro) in the denominator.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top