Stellar Classification Limits: Temperature & Magnitude

AI Thread Summary
Stellar classification lacks universally agreed-upon boundaries for temperature and magnitude, leading to significant discrepancies in various charts and tables. For instance, classifications for 'K'-class stars show temperature ranges that vary widely between sources, indicating a lack of consensus. While HR diagrams provide a general framework for categorizing stars, the exact limits for spectral types and luminosity classes remain ambiguous. This variability raises questions about whether stellar classification is inherently subjective or if objective definitions exist. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need for clearer standards in stellar classification.
ckirmser
Messages
105
Reaction score
3
Is there a specific limit that defines the boundaries of each classification category?

For example, a main sequence G class star is between X and Y temperatures and has an absolute magnitude between A and B Solar units.

Or, an O hypergiant is between X and Y temperatures and has an absolute magnitude between A and B Solar units.

Along those lines. Essentially, something mathematical that can be used to plug in the characteristics of a star and will produce the classification.

So, if I have a star that has a temperature of 5699K and a Mabs of 0.9M, it pops out with a G2IV (the "2" is just a guess from eyeballing an HR chart).

Or, are the classifications not that explicit?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In terms of temperature and luminosity that's what the HR diagrams shows, the star's classifications.
 
Well, yes, but the various charts I've found are not in total agreement on the boundaries.

I've found several tables listing numeric limits for, say, a 'K'-class star, but there is a substantial variance in the listed or pictured properties.

For example, one table I have says a 'K'-class star has a temperature range of 3.5 kK to 5 kK, whereas another has just 5.3 kK, not even an average, but totally outside the bounds listed in the other table.

It looks like stellar classification is a very subjective matter and I'm trying to determine if I am wrong and that there is a set definition that determines a star's spectral type, its luminosity class and its Yerkes class.

If it is truly all subjective, then I can go with that, but I would expect that there are set, objective boundaries.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top