Step potential - question about reflection coefficient

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi. I've been trying to understand the phenomenon of step potential, when energy of particle E is higher than the potential V.
Then we have solution on both sides of boundary in the form of wave functions...
Is the reflection coefficient in this case simply (E-V)/E ??
Can anyone show me a more formal explanation, however not as formal as in books (so that i understand :)
What does the quantum mechanical coefficient really tell us (in comparison with classical thinking)?
If we think about it classically I think we can be sure that particle gets transmitted at boundary, but loses some energy.
From the QM point of view, on the other hand I guess we have a probability that particle gets reflected?

Please tell me if my reasoning is correct:) cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trelek2 said:
Is the reflection coefficient in this case simply (E-V)/E ??

No, it's

R = {\left( \frac {\sqrt{E} - \sqrt{E - V}} {\sqrt{E} + \sqrt{E - V}} \right)}^2

Can anyone show me a more formal explanation, however not as formal as in books (so that i understand :)

I don't know any other way to justify this particular equation except by solving the Schrödinger equation on both sides of the step boundary, and applying the boundary conditions at the boundary, as described http://www.cobalt.chem.ucalgary.ca/ziegler/educmat/chm386/rudiment/models/barrier/barsola.htm.

What does the quantum mechanical coefficient really tell us (in comparison with classical thinking)?
If we think about it classically I think we can be sure that particle gets transmitted at boundary, but loses some energy.
From the QM point of view, on the other hand I guess we have a probability that particle gets reflected?

Exactly. If you have a particle coming in from the "low" side of the step, it has probability R of ending up on that side of the step, moving in the opposite direction; and probability 1 - R of ending up on the other side of the step, continuing in the same direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks:]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top