Steric inhibition of protonation in o-substituted anilines

AI Thread Summary
Protonation of o-substituted anilines leads to steric hindrance, making the conjugate acid unstable and the amine less basic, as noted in the textbook. This effect is observed with methyl groups but not with methoxy (-OCH3) or hydroxyl (-OH) groups, likely due to hydrogen bonding stabilizing the protonated amine. In o-nitroaniline, steric hindrance arises because the nitro group's geometry forces proximity to the anilinium protons, resulting in decreased basicity. The lone pair on the oxygen in methoxy and hydroxyl groups can stabilize the structure by orienting towards the anilinium instead. Understanding these interactions may benefit from molecular modeling software for visualizing steric effects.
Vishesh Jain
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



According to my textbook (Organic Chemistry by Solomon & Fryhle) "When an o-substituted aniline is protonated (at the N), increase of H-N-H bond angle leads to steric hindrance with the group at the o-position. This makes this protonated conjugate acid unstable and makes the amine less basic." But why dosen't it apply when the o-substituent is -OH or -OCH3 ?

The attempt at a solution

Because this effect operates when a methyl group is at ortho (as shown in textbook photo) but it dosen't for a methoxy (much bulkier) group, i presumed it's due to the O in -OCH3 which forms a H-bond with the protonated amine (thereby stabilizing it). But this steric inhibition effect operates in o-nitro aniline, (according to this image) where also there should be H-bonding, and o-nitroaniline is the weakest base. Why steric inhibition effect applies in case of o-nitroaniline but not o-methoxy aniline ..?

Explanations involving computational chemistry & molecular orbitals are most welcome.
SIP effect aniline.jpg
?
 

Attachments

  • SIP effect aniline.jpg
    SIP effect aniline.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 1,926
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a question where access to either a molecular modeling kit or modeling software helps out a lot. Maybe take a look at Avogadro:
https://avogadro.cc
or similar software.

To address your question more directly (and which becomes immediately obvious with a model), the lowest energy geometry of nitrobenzene is planar, but constraining the nitro group to be coplanar with the aryl ring in o-nitroaniline puts one of the oxygens extremely close to the protons in the anilinium group. This is where the steric hindrance comes into play. In the hydroxyl and methoxy analogs, the lone pair on the oxygen instead can point toward the anilinium.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and DrClaude
Thank you for your reply sir, and also for your software tip ...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top