Stoichiometry, concentration of solutions: Ba(OH)2 and H3PO4

AI Thread Summary
To determine the volume of 0.0521 M Ba(OH)2 needed to react with 24.50 mL of 0.141 M H3PO4, the balanced equation is 3Ba(OH)2 + 2H3PO4 → Ba3(PO4)2 + 6H2O. The calculation initially yielded 199.0 mL of Ba(OH)2, but this was identified as incorrect due to an error in applying the mole ratio. The correct mole ratio of Ba(OH)2 to H3PO4 is 3:2, leading to the conclusion that only 99.5 mL of Ba(OH)2 is required. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying stoichiometric ratios in solution concentration calculations.
9781133886563
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What volume of 0.0521 M Ba(OH)2 is required to react completely with 24.50 mL of 0.141 M H3PO4? Phosphoric acid is a triprotic acid.

Answer: volume of 0.0521 M Ba(OH)2 required = 99.5 mL

2. The attempt at a solution
1. I begin by balancing the equation: 3Ba(OH)2 + 2H3PO4 → Ba3(PO4)2 + 6H2O

2. I use M = Molarity = mol solute / L solution to find the mols of H3PO4... mol = 0.141 × 24.50 mL = 3.45 mol

3. According to the mole ratio... 3 × 3.45 mol of Ba(OH)2 = 10.36 mol of Ba(OH)2 needed.

4. M = mol/L ... mL = 10.36 mol / .0521 M = 199.0 mL of Ba(OH)2 needed, which is a wrong answer.

These are the steps I am taking. I must be making a mistake since I know that the answer is 99.5 mL.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
9781133886563 said:
3. According to the mole ratio... 3 × 3.45 mol of Ba(OH)2 = 10.36 mol of Ba(OH)2 needed.

Check this again.
 
Note that your answer is exactly twice too large (which points in exactly the same direction Pranav-Arora alredy signaled).
 
I see it now. The mole ratio is 3/2.

Thank you both.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top