Stoichiometry: confused about the question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a stoichiometry problem involving a mixture of CaCl2 and NaCl, where Ca is precipitated as CaCO3 and then converted to CaO. Participants emphasize that a balanced chemical equation is not necessary; instead, the atomic masses can be used to determine the moles of CaO, which directly relates to the moles of CaCl2. By calculating the grams of Ca in CaO, one can find the corresponding grams of CaCl2 and then determine its percentage in the original mixture. The conversation highlights that many students struggle with the arithmetic of proportions in chemistry. Understanding the basic relationships and calculations is key to solving such problems effectively.
dracolnyte
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 4.22g mixture of CaCl2 and NaCl was dissolved, and then treated to precipitate all of the Ca as CaCO3, which was then heated to drive off CO2, leaving a sample of pure CaO which was found to weigh 0.969g. What percentage of the original mixture was CaCl[/SUB]2[/SUB]?

I think I know how to solve this question if I just knew the balanced chemical equation for this.

The Attempt at a Solution


If i knew the balanced chemical equation, i can just calculate the moles for CaO, then do ratios to find the moles of CaCl2, convert it back to grams and divide over 4.22g to find percentage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have/are given two equations in two unknowns: the solution for the second equation is trivial, 0.969/MW(CaO). The 4.22 g mixture is xMW(NaCl) + (1-x)MW(CaCl2).
 
dracolnyte said:

Homework Statement


a 4.22g mixture of CaCl2 and NaCl was dissolved, and then treated to precipitate all of the Ca as CaCO3, which was then heated to drive off CO2, leaving a sample of pure CaO which was found to weigh 0.969g. What percentage of the original mixture was CaCl[/SUB]2[/SUB]?

I think I know how to solve this question if I just knew the balanced chemical equation for this.

The Attempt at a Solution


If i knew the balanced chemical equation, i can just calculate the moles for CaO, then do ratios to find the moles of CaCl2, convert it back to grams and divide over 4.22g to find percentage.

You don't need any 'balanced equation' whatever that would be - you have got the formulae that give you the composition of the substances stated right there in the problem. Using atomic masses of Ca and O you can find the number of moles of CaO which then is the same as the number of moles of Ca which is in turn the same as the number of moles of CaCl2.
You don't even need to calculate the number of moles really - you can just calculate the grams of Ca in Ca0 by atomic or molecular mass. Then that's the number of grams of Ca in the CaCl2 it came from vand from that, again by proportions, you calculate what was the number of grams of CaCl2.

This sort of chemistry is basically arithmetic of proportions.

It seems to throw some students. They have forgotten the arithmetic of proportions.

May be another reason is the formulae look like algebra.:eek: If it's any help, try drawing these molecules with the appropriate number of blobs, Little white blob for a Ca atom, a black one for a Cl atom, and a red one for an O atom, and write the atomic mass just next to each blob; you might latch on to the idea more easily.
 
Last edited:
:oldgrumpy:

Note to self: remember to look at the dates of original postings - there has been more than time to get a complete chemical education since this was posted.
 
epenguin said:
Note to self: remember to look at the dates of original postings
Some people collect stamps --- on the other hand, I browse the "practice forum," so when you see me/my response(s), check the original date.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top