I Stoke's equation -- particle size

Kbaba
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to solve stokes eq. for particle diameter in um size. Do i have to change the units to make them uniform. please help in solving the eq. by plugging these numbers.
velocity= 50 mm/h
Particle density= 2650 kg/m^3
Medium density= 1000 kg/m^3
viscosity = 1.002 mPa
Gravity= 9.8 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you work with units consistently, you cannot make anything wrong.
Some unit conversions can be necessary to get a nice unit for the result.
 
Kbaba said:
I want to solve stokes eq. for particle diameter in um size. Do i have to change the units to make them uniform. please help in solving the eq. by plugging these numbers.
velocity= 50 mm/h
Particle density= 2650 kg/m^3
Medium density= 1000 kg/m^3
viscosity = 1.002 mPa
Gravity= 9.8 m/s^2

Your units of viscosity are incorrect, could/should be mPa*s.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thanks for advise. Also, I want to solve the following equation for particle size (d) using stokes eq
V= g (Ps – Pw) d2/18 µ

for unknown variable (d) i rearranged the eq. as follow and took the square root of my answer. Is this the correct way to rearrange and solve this eq for particle size determination. Please, advise.

d= 18 µ V/ g (Ps – Pw)
 
Something went wrong with the formatting. I guess you mean this:$$V= \frac {g(P_s-P_w)d^2}{18 \mu}$$
Solved for d:$$d= \sqrt \frac{18 \mu V} {g(P_s-P_w)}$$
Sure.
 
I would recommend that you use dimensionless variables. It will greatly simplify your calculations if you are planning to find the flow profile.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top