Stokes' Theorem Verification for Triangle with Given Vertices

  • Thread starter Thread starter c0der
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
c0der
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Verify Stokes' theorem for the following:

F=[y^2, x^2, -x+z]

Around the triangle with vertices (0,0,1),(1,0,1),(1,1,1)

Homework Equations


\int\int_S(curlF)\cdot ndA=\int_C F\cdot r' ds

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For the LHS:
curlF\cdot n=2x-2y
\int\int_S(curlF)\cdot ndA=\int_0^1 \int_0^{1-x}2x-2ydydx

This gives zero. Also integrating over the three curves of the triangle gives zero. However, the book's answer is 1/3. Any idea what the mistake is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c0der said:

Homework Statement


Verify Stokes' theorem for the following:

F=[y^2, x^2, -x+z]

Around the triangle with vertices (0,0,1),(1,0,1),(1,1,1)

Homework Equations


\int\int_S(curlF)\cdot ndA=\int_C F\cdot r' ds

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For the LHS:
curlF\cdot n=2x-2y
\int\int_S(curlF)\cdot ndA=\int_0^1 \int_0^{1-x}2x-2ydydx

This gives zero. Also integrating over the three curves of the triangle gives zero. However, the book's answer is 1/3. Any idea what the mistake is?

First of all, the area of integration is wrong. The triangle is bounded by the line x = y, the x axis, and the line y = 1.

Second, in this area, the integrand is 2x - 2y = 2(x-y). For the entire area, this is positive (except for at the boundary x = y, where it is zero). The result must therefore be positive. Try drawing the points (in the x-y-plane, the z-coordinate is constant) on a piece of paper. In the region you have integrated over, the integrand is antisymmetric with respect to x=y and the the area is symmetric with respect to this and should therefore give a zero result.

In short, you have verified Stokes' theorem, but for a different curve.
 
Thank you, stupid me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top