Storing Energy in a Rubber Band: Does Mass Increase?

AI Thread Summary
When a rubber band is stretched, it stores elastic potential energy, which theoretically increases its mass according to the principles of physics. This stored energy contributes to a slight increase in weight, similar to how a charged battery weighs more than a discharged one. The discussion encourages calculating the actual mass increase to understand the concept better. The energy stored in the stretched rubber band cannot dissipate, reinforcing the idea that it equates to mass. Overall, stretching a rubber band does result in a measurable increase in mass due to the energy stored within it.
deadcat
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
Does this mean if I had a rubber band and weighed it, then stretched and weighed it while being stretched out, that it would weigh more at that time? Since at that time it has stored energy, which equates to mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is what it means. And a charged battery will weigh slightly more than discharged battery, and so forth.

It is a worthwhile exercise to calculate just how much mass increase we're talking about... Try it!
 
Nugatory said:
Yes, that is what it means.

If you stretch out a rubber band the energy is converted into elastic potential energy. The fact that the rubber band is stretched out proves that the vast majority of the energy cannot go anywhere else, eg. mass.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top