Strange behavior of thermal expansion and resistivity equations

atat1tata

The equation of linear thermal expansion is $$l=l_0\left[1 + \alpha(t - t_0)\right]$$ (it is similar also to the equation of resistivity, $$\rho=\rho_0\left[1 + \alpha(t - t_0)\right]$$)

$$\alpha$$ is a constant dependent only on the material we are speaking about.

Now, let's say I have a bar 100 m long at 0°C. The material I'm using has a coefficient of thermal expansion of 0.01 1/°C. I'm heating it to 10°C
So $$l_0 = 100 m$$, $$t_0 = 0°C$$, $$\alpha = 0.01 °C^{-1}$$, t = 10 °C

$$l=(100 m)\left[1 + 0.01 °C^{-1} (10 °C)\right] = 1.1(100 m) = 110 m$$

Now, I have a bar 110 m long at 10°C and I want to return it to 0°C.
So $$l_0 = 110 m$$, $$t_0 = 10°C$$, $$\alpha = 0.01 °C^{-1}$$, $$t = 0 °C$$

$$l=(110 m)\left[1 + 0.01 °C^{-1} (-10 °C)\right] = 0.9(110 m) = 99 m$$

With resistance there are almost the same problems. Where am I wrong?

Last edited:
Related Other Physics Topics News on Phys.org

AJ Bentley

The formula you are using are only approximations, roughly correct around room temperature. You can't expect precise results.

netheril96

Rewrite it in canonical linear function
$$l = \left( {{l_0} - \alpha {l_0}{t_0}} \right) + \alpha {l_0}t$$
This should hold for all $${l_0}$$ in an ideal situation,so this suggest that $$\alpha$$ is dependent on $${l_0}$$,or more specifically,inverse proportional.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving