Strange definition of regularization of Operators

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
surfing the web and arxiv i found the strange formula

lnA= \frac{d^{n}}{ds^{n}} \frac{s^{n-1}}{n! A^{s}}

my question is .. where does this formula come from ??

here 'n' is supposed to be a finite parameter we must define to avoid the divergences, is it valid for non-renormalizable or renormalizable theories ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mhill said:
surfing the web and arxiv i found the strange formula

Whenever you want to do something like this, you must make a full citation of the source to put this into a proper context. Or else this may not make any sense.

Zz.
 
The -\lim_{s\to 0} out in front is important.
 
Formally taking a derivative wrt to A on both sides should prove the identity to you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top