Strange phenomenon observed, friction and wear

AI Thread Summary
A machine using reinforced Teflon as a wear ring on a polished metal surface shows significant differences in wear rates depending on the gas exposure. In hydrogen, the Teflon lasts about 10,000 hours, while in helium, it only lasts around 40 hours. This indicates that wear rates are highly dependent on the gas involved, despite other conditions being constant. There is speculation that the coefficient of friction may also vary with gas type, with some theories suggesting hydrogen could form bonds with the metal surface, affecting wear. Further research is needed to understand these phenomena and their implications for material selection in similar applications.
Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Messages
3,012
Reaction score
42
There's a machine that uses a type of plastic material (reinforced Teflon) as a wear ring. The plastic rides on a highly polished metal surface and eventually wears out at which point the machine must be rebuilt.

If the plastic and metal sliding surfaces are exposed to bone dry (ie: no water vapor whatsoever) hydrogen, the plastic will wear out after roughly 10,000 hours of use.

If the plastic and metal sliding surfaces are exposed to bone dry helium, the plastic will wear out after only 40 hours of use. Obviously, this material is no good for this service and another material must be used.

So wear rate seems to be highly dependant on the gas involved. Note that all other parameters are identical, including pressure, temperature, contact stress, velocity, etc…

I've also heard circumstantial evidence that coefficient of friction may also depend on the gas involved. I don't believe the conventional view (of friction coefficient or wear rate) acknowledges any sort of difference based on what gas materials are exposed to, but at least in the case of wear rate, I have overwhelming evidence that wear rate is strongly related to which gas is involved. Now I'm wondering if coefficient of friction might also be related.

Does anyone know if or how coefficient of friction might vary depending on the gas involved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a wild speculation, maybe hydrogen forms some bonds with the metal surface reducing wear?

edit: Another wild speculation: there is a tendency of metal to form metal hydrides because of a potential difference. Now a plastic contains hydrogen atoms. Although the H in plastic can't bond with metal, maybe it is attracted to the metal causing friction. Now in hydrogen environment, a fraction of the metal surface reacts with hydrogen to form hydrides. The hydrogen in these hydrides is not attracted or maybe repels the H in the plastic reducing friction?
 
Last edited:
Hi Sid. Teflon is a essentially a carbon (think of a hydrocarbon) chain with florine where hydrogen would otherwise be. So there's no hydrogen in Teflon (the plastic being used). In fact, Teflon can have a slightly exothermic reaction with hydrogen under the right circumstances. I believe it's the florine that bonds to hydrogen forming HF and a second hydrogen takes the place of the F on the carbon chain.

I've talked to some chemists in my company about this and didn't come up with much. Not sure why the hydrogen should affect the metal and form any kind of layer. I don't think that happens. The use of Teflon in wearing parts like this is so that a microscopically thin layer of Teflon coats the metal. The Teflon part is then riding on this thin film. One theory holds that the film may be swept off more readily by helium for some reason.
 
Thanks Fred. I can open the link, but the paper must be some place else and I can't seem to find the link. :confused:

Could there be an adsorption issue when going from the hydrogen to the helium?
ummmmm, not sure what you mean. Just to clarify, the machine never sees both fluids. There are numerous machines, some are started up and run with hydrogen and some start up and run with helium but they are otherwise identical. The machines never see both services in their lifetime.

You did however give me some more ideas for searches and I'm looking a bit more now. Still haven't found much of interest but thanks for the ideas. :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top