A Stream functions and flow around sphere/cylinder

AI Thread Summary
Velocity in polar coordinates is defined as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,z)}{r} \vec{e_\theta}$$ and in spherical coordinates as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,\phi)}{r \sin \phi} \vec{e_\theta}$$ to simplify the equations that follow. The division by ##r## and ##r \sin \phi## serves to account for the geometric differences in coordinate systems, making the mathematical expressions more manageable. The discussion highlights the expectation of using different symbols for angles in spherical coordinates, specifically with ##\vartheta## and ##\varphi##. Ultimately, the choice of these definitions aids in achieving clearer and more concise formulations in fluid dynamics.
member 428835
Hi PF!

I am wondering why we define velocity for polar coordinates as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,z)}{r} \vec{e_\theta}$$ and why we define velocity in spherical coordinates as $$\vec{V} = \nabla \times \frac{\psi(r,\phi)}{r \sin \phi} \vec{e_\theta}$$

The only thing I don't understand is why we divide by ##r## and then ##r \sin \phi## (which are really sort of the same dimension, just the spherical is a projection). Is this simply to make the equations that follow nicer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's because your equations become simpler, although your spherical coordinates are strange. I'd expect (with ##\vartheta## the polar and ##\varphi## the azimuthal angles)
$$\vec{v}=\vec{\nabla} \times \left (\frac{\psi(r,\vartheta)}{r \sin \vartheta} \vec{e}_{\varphi} \right).$$
Then you get
$$\vec{v}=\vec{e}_r \frac{1}{r^2 \sin \vartheta} \partial_{\vartheta} \psi-\vec{e}_{\vartheta} \frac{1}{r \sin \vartheta} \partial_r \psi.$$
 
Shoot, we may be using a different symbols for different angles. Awesome, thanks for your response!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top