Strength of magnetic field at a point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the strength of the magnetic field at point P due to semicircular wires. The user initially applies the formula B = u*I/(2*pi*d) for straight wires, resulting in an incorrect value of 5×10^-5 T instead of the expected 7.9×10^-5 T. It is highlighted that the formula used is not suitable for semicircular wires, which require a different approach. Participants suggest reviewing textbook resources for the appropriate formula for semicircular configurations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct equations for specific geometries in magnetic field calculations.
erinec
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/9572/picture2ehv.png

What is the strength of the magnetic field at point P?

The answer is 7.9×10^−5 T.

However, I used the equation B = u*I/(2*pi*d) and keep getting 5*10^-5 T.


Homework Equations


B = u*I / (2*pi*d)


The Attempt at a Solution



Nearer wire:
B = uI/(2*pi*d) = (1.257*10^-6)(5.0)/(2*pi*0.02) = 0.00005 T
Further wire:
B = uI/(2*pi*d) = (1.257*10^-6)(5.0)/(2*pi*0.01) = 0.0001 T
Total B:
B = 0.0001T - 0.00005T = 0.00005 T

What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi erinec,

erinec said:

Homework Statement



http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/9572/picture2ehv.png

What is the strength of the magnetic field at point P?

The answer is 7.9×10^−5 T.

However, I used the equation B = u*I/(2*pi*d) and keep getting 5*10^-5 T.


Homework Equations


B = u*I / (2*pi*d)

This formula gives the magnitude of the B-field of a long straight wire (at a distance d away from the wire).

But in this problem you don't have straight wires creating the magnetic field at P; the wires are semicircles. Look through your textbook again and see if you can find a formula that better fits this situation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top