How to Derive Equation 2 for Stress Analysis in Flywheels

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Equation 2 for stress analysis in flywheels, specifically addressing the transition from a complex expression to a simplified form involving hoop and radial stresses. The user expresses confusion about taking limits, particularly how the term 2⋅σt⋅δrsin(1/2⋅δθ) simplifies to σt. It is clarified that using the small angle approximation, where sin(x) is approximated by x for small values, is key to this simplification. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing common factors in the equations, which ultimately leads to the derivation of the second equation. Understanding these mathematical principles is crucial for successfully completing the stress analysis.
James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
Hello, I'm trying to follow along with the stress analysis derivation for flywheels given here, but I'm stuck at the point where it says:2⋅σ t⋅δrsin(1/2⋅δθ) + σrδθ - (σr + δσr) (r + σr )θδθ = ρr2ω2δr ⋅δθ

in the limit reduces to:

σ_t- σ_r - r⋅\frac{dσ_r}{dr}= \rho⋅r^2 ω^2

I'm a little rusty on limits and how to perform them. If you follow the link, there's a pretty good drawing of the differential element which explains equation 1. I'm just not sure how to get equation 2.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This all comes from a differential force balance in the radial direction. The free body has sides rdθ and dr. The σt term comes from the hoop stress. The σr terms come from the radial direction, and takes into account the variation of r across the free body radially. The term on the right hand side is the centripetal force term.

Chet
 
I understand why all the forces on the stress element are there. I just don't understand how the limit is taken. For instance, why the first term, 2⋅σ t⋅δrsin(1/2⋅δθ), reduces to σt. I know it's probably just some basic mathematics here, but my experience with limits was a while back and it mostly involved ratios.
 
##\sin(x) \approx x## for small x.

All terms have δr δθ as common factor at leading order, which gets removed to give the second equation.
 
  • Like
Likes James Brady
Ah, the small angle approximation. I totally forgot about that. Thank you.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top