Stress in thick walled cylinders

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluffreggie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinders Stress
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations related to stress in thick-walled cylinders, specifically focusing on the rearrangement of the equation sigma r = (E/1-v^2)*(er-veh). The user seeks assistance with rearranging the equation to isolate er. After attempting a rearrangement, the user presents the equation er = (sigma r * (1-v^2) + veh) / E and asks for confirmation. Further clarification is sought on moving the term Q (where Q = E/1-v^2) to facilitate the rearrangement. The conversation highlights the challenges of manipulating complex equations in stress analysis.
bluffreggie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I found some experimental data on a website the other day and i have been trying to do some calculations.

Im getting suck up on the rearrangement(never been my strong point) and its driving me bonkers!

Any help at all would be appricated.

need to have er as the subject.

sigma r = (E/1-v^2)*(er-veh)

Ive had a go and all I am getting is;

er = sigma r * (1-v^2)+veh all over E

can anyone confirm?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
if you let (E/1-v^2) = Q then what would happen when you move Q to the other side? the 2nd bracket (er-veh) can now be opened.
 
Right ok then, i have sigma r /Q = er - veh,
then I have

(sigma r/Q)+veh=er

does this look better?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Back
Top