Calculating Work Required to Stretch a Spring by Additional Distance

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to stretch a spring, the initial work of 6 J for a 2 cm stretch is used to derive the spring constant. The total work for a 6 cm stretch is calculated using the formula W = 1/2kx^2, resulting in 54 J. The additional work needed to stretch from 2 cm to 6 cm is found by subtracting the initial work from the total work, leading to 48 J. However, it is noted that the spring constant does not need to be computed directly, as a relationship between work and displacement can simplify the calculation. The conclusion confirms that the additional work required is indeed 48 J.
RGBolton95
Hey everyone,

I'm really hoping somebody will be able to help me with this problem. I've searched all through my textbook, notes, and the Internet, but I keep getting the wrong answer. Here's the question:

If it requires 6 J of work to stretch a particular spring by 2.0 cm from its equilibrium length, how much more work will be required to stretch it an additional 4 cm?

I start by finding k, the spring constant. I do this by using the equation W = 1/2kx^2. I plug in the known values of work and x in the equation, which gives me 30,000 Nm (I changed 2 cm to 0.02 m). Now that I know k, I find the total work to pull the spring down 0.06 m (the original 0.02 m plus the additional 0.04 m). I use the same W = 1/2kx^2 equation, with W being the unknown, k = 30,000 Nm, and x = 0.06. This gave me a W = 54 J. From there, I know that to find the additional work needed to pull down the spring from 0.02 m to 0.06 m I should just subtract 6 J from 54 J, which gives me a final answer of 48 J. However, I keep getting told that this is the wrong answer. Any idea where I'm making my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your result is correct.

You should double check the units of your spring constant though.

Note that you really do not need to compute the spring constant, it is sufficient to note that
$$
2W_2 = k x_2^2 = k(3x_1)^2 = 9kx_1^2 = 18W_1
$$
and therefore ##W_2 = 9W_1## and ##W_2-W_1 = 8W_1 = 8\cdot 6\ \mathrm{J} = 48\ \mathrm{J}##.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top