String Theory: Understanding Superstring Theory and Its Location

  • Thread starter Thread starter redhedkangaro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Superstring
redhedkangaro
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is called superstring theory since the theory provides supersymmetry (symmetry between fermions and bosons) - i.e. superstring theory is short hand of Supersymmetric String Theory
 
redhedkangaro said:
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
No, string theory says that particles are not really pointlike objects, but objects slightly extended in one dimension. There is no only one string in the universe, but many of them - each elementary particle is actually a little string.
 
Thanks that helps a lot. Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
 
redhedkangaro said:
Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
Are you asking which facts suggested historically the string hypothesis ?

First, the very idea that things are made of vibrating string is fairly old. I think you can easily go back to before we knew even what atoms are. I have vague memories of 19th century models of atoms as knotted objects.

Second, one could argue that it is a natural generalization of quantum field theory of particles. Generally speaking, a particle is a 0 dimensional object. If you have difficulties to construct a consistent theory of 0 dimensional objects, you may want to even try what happens with object of larger dimensions, starting with 1. You would find out that you need to include also other kind of higher dimensional structures, such as branes.

Third, before the advent of QCD there was around the idea that hadrons could be better explained in terms of strings. That was a very promising idea. It met with difficulties around the same time as QCD was understood, but later people realized they could still use it to construct elegant unified models.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top