Struggling with Integrals? Here's How to Improve!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vadim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind
AI Thread Summary
Understanding integrals can be challenging, even for those familiar with the basic concepts of anti-derivatives and area under curves. To improve, consistent practice is essential, as familiarity with different integration techniques like substitution and integration by parts can enhance proficiency. Utilizing online resources and seeking help from tutors or peers can provide additional support. Breaking down complex problems into simpler steps can also make them more manageable. With dedication and practice, improvement in integral skills is achievable.
Vadim
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm coming to a realization that i really don't get how to do integrals.
i understand the basic concept, it's an anti-derivative. when you evaluate them, you sub in the values that you want to evaluate, and subtract them bottom from top.

i also understand that when you integrate, you get the area under the graph, and that you can use them to find the volume when you rotate the graph around an axis.

all that said, i still have extreme difficulty with them for no reason that i can pin point. I'm doing the course through distance ed, and my contact person is useless, so I'm turning here for a little help, if someone could point out something I'm missing, maybe just explain them again in a slightly different way...

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the basic concept down. I guess the most effective way to get good is to practice. I used to be horrible at integrals, but i have gotten much better, yet I am no expert...i practiced a lot. get familiar with all of the different techniques of integrals, like u substitution, trig sub, by parts..etc. And again, just practice, and you should get better.
 


Thank you for sharing your struggle with integrals. It's completely normal to have difficulty with them, as they can be quite complex and require a lot of practice and understanding. Here are a few tips that may help you improve your understanding and proficiency in integrals:

1. Practice, practice, practice: The more you practice, the more comfortable you will become with integrals. Try to solve as many problems as you can, and don't be afraid to make mistakes. Learning from your mistakes is an important part of the learning process.

2. Understand the concept of integration: As you mentioned, integration is the reverse process of differentiation. It involves finding the anti-derivative or the original function from its derivative. Make sure you have a clear understanding of this concept before moving on to more complex integrals.

3. Familiarize yourself with different integration techniques: There are several techniques for solving integrals, such as substitution, integration by parts, and trigonometric substitution. Make sure you are familiar with these techniques and know when to apply them.

4. Use resources and seek help: There are plenty of online resources, such as videos, tutorials, and practice problems, that can help you improve your understanding of integrals. You can also seek help from a tutor or your classmates if you are struggling with a specific concept.

5. Break down the problem: Sometimes integrals can look intimidating, but breaking them down into smaller, simpler steps can make them more manageable. Start by identifying the variables and constants, then try to simplify the integrand before attempting to solve it.

Remember, it's okay to struggle with integrals. Don't get discouraged and keep practicing and seeking help when needed. With determination and perseverance, you will improve your skills and become more confident in solving integrals.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top