Struggling with Rankine-Hugoniot Conditions?

fabianprewett1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is Rankine-Hugoniot conditions at a hydrodynamic shock front. Where P2=0 v2=0.

The problem is attached. I need to solve a system of equations. I thought it would be relatively straight forward solving for the three unknowns but I'm struggling. I know it's possible to solve but maybe not just rearranging the equations as I've been trying. Am I missing an assumption or something?

Homework Equations


The equations are attached.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just want to know if simply using algebra will work for rearranging/solving this system. All I can solve for so far is P1/V1=Vs*ρ2 from the first two equations. Anything I try with w in equation 3 gives me multiple terms with the variables I'm trying to solve for. I feel like something should be 0 or some other assumption.
 

Attachments

  • Shock.PNG
    Shock.PNG
    7.5 KB · Views: 402
  • eq astr.PNG
    eq astr.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 405
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show us your actual calculations if you want us to comment on them. Your description is too vague to do anything with, the section "Attempt at a Solution" is meant to actually show the work you've done toward a solution.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thanks. I solved it. I was missing something basic.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top