Stuck on (proving) a linear charge problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a linear charge problem where the participant struggles with part c, specifically how the inverse square root relates to the final equation. They express confusion about the application of trigonometric substitution and the relevance of their equation to the problem. The conversation suggests reviewing Taylor expansions and the binomial series to clarify the concepts involved. Additionally, there is an emphasis on understanding the calculation of forces between point charges and extending that to continuous charge distributions. The participant has successfully completed earlier parts of the problem but seeks further guidance on the more complex aspects.
FlyingButtress
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question:[/B]
FmUcWz3.png


____________________________________________________________________________________

And the answer in the solution manual:
cbl0WP6.png

Homework Equations


Trig sub? a^2/x^2 = tan(θ)
I'm thinking x>>a would affect this majorly and I'm not seeing how.

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the concept behind this (I think), but part c is killing me right now. I have no idea how the inverse square root turns into the final equation. Maybe I should have posted this in Calculus, but I have no recollection of learning this in calc I/II, nor physics I/II so I didn't know where to post.

The a^2/x^2 looks eerily similar to a trig sub problem, but I don't see how that would work because there's no integral.

For E_x, I was able to set the limit of a to 0 to get the point charge equation. The solution manual didn't do it this way but it worked for me to get the point charge equation.

BTW I already have a) and b), which were pretty straightforward.
Could someone point me in the right direction please? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FlyingButtress said:

Homework Equations


Trig sub? a^2/x^2 = tan(θ)
You should double-check that with the definition of the tangent.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I understand the concept behind this (I think), but part c is killing me right now. I have no idea how the inverse square root turns into the final equation. Maybe I should have posted this in Calculus, but I have no recollection of learning this in calc I/II, nor physics I/II so I didn't know where to post.

The a^2/x^2 looks eerily similar to a trig sub problem, but I don't see how that would work because there's no integral.

For E_x, I was able to set the limit of a to 0 to get the point charge equation. The solution manual didn't do it this way but it worked for me to get the point charge equation.

BTW I already have a) and b), which were pretty straightforward.
Could someone point me in the right direction please? Thank you!
Assuming you have the first two parts, you might want to take a look at the Taylor expansion of those answers.
 
How do you come to the conclusion that your equation is relevant for the problem? You should rather think about the question, how to calculate the force between two point charges and then how you can generalize this to many point charges and finally to a continuous charge distribution!
 
tms said:
You should double-check that with the definition of the tangent.Assuming you have the first two parts, you might want to take a look at the Taylor expansion of those answers.

Ah, okay. The format change to (1+x)^(n) is making more sense now... I'm very rusty on infinite series so I'll have to take some time to review. From a brief look at my calc book it looks like it matches the binomial series. Will spend more time to see if it is right. Thanks!

vanhees71 said:
How do you come to the conclusion that your equation is relevant for the problem? You should rather think about the question, how to calculate the force between two point charges and then how you can generalize this to many point charges and finally to a continuous charge distribution!

They just looked similar, like y^2/x^2
No other reason.
I actually did use that for part a, solving for E_x, but I've already solved parts a and b :) Sorry if I wasn't clear.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top