Study plan for Spivak's Calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of mastering calculus using Spivak's textbook compared to a more accessible main textbook. The participant expresses concern about falling behind due to the difficulty of Spivak's material and considers solving only half of the exercises with answers to manage their workload. Responses indicate that while completing exercises is not strictly necessary for understanding the material, they significantly enhance intuition and provide valuable examples and techniques. Ultimately, a balance between reading and practicing exercises is recommended, with a consensus that engaging with exercises leads to deeper comprehension and retention of concepts.
carlosbgois
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
The main textbook for my calculus course is much easier to grasp than Spivak's,
and I may be in risk of getting behind the class, as I take much more time in each subject when using spivak instead of the indicated book.

Then, I was thinking about solving all the exercises on spivak which have answers in the book (I think they're 1/2 of the total), and moving on to the next chapter's, to come back for all exercises if I find some free time.

Is it a good plan? Will I be able to understand the next chapters by doing only half of the exercises?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlosbgois said:
Will I be able to understand the next chapters by doing only half of the exercises?

Yes, certainly. In fact, you'll be able to understand everything without making any exercise at all! I don't think Spivak hides essential stuff in his exercises...

That said, exercises improve your intuiton and might give you examples, counterexamples, techniques, etc. that you wouldn't normally have. So while making exercises isn't necessary, it certainly has a lot of value. The more exercises you make, the more you understand what exactly is going on!
 
  • Like
Likes Simpl0S
Thank you. I've always had some doubt about what is best, in relation to time spent and amount or learning: reading or exercising. I'd rather be able to read and learn, and apply the knowledge only when really necessary, instead of spending a lot of time exercising, but I'm coming to the conclusion that exercising is way better then reading and re-reading.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top