1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Stupid question sorry

  1. Feb 1, 2005 #1
    This sounds like a stupid question. However my teacher didnt really explain it well.
    Its my first day back at school, cut me some slack thx.

    - Calculate the frequency of a lightwave of wavelengh 500nm. Travelling at speed of light (3x10^8 ms-1)
    -----------------------------------------
    I WILL SUBSITUTE LAMBDA for H (cause i dont know how to type it)

    f = ?
    h = 500nm
    V = 3x10^8 ms-1.

    So 500nm x 10^-9 = 0.0000005m

    V = fh

    Therefore f = h/V

    0.0000005m / 3000 000 00ms = ???

    Would that be 1.66666666666666666 x10^-15???

    BTW- can someone tell me how to input equations?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2005 #2
    your algebra is not quite correct
     
  4. Feb 1, 2005 #3
    err,
    V = fXh
    Divide out the f... f/V = h. So you would have to multiply out the V to get/

    f = vh ??

    0.0000005m x 3000 000 00ms = ???

    so F=150? ?
     
  5. Feb 1, 2005 #4
    V = fh

    V/h = fh/h
    V/h = f

    from memory green light should have a freq around something x 10^14
     
  6. Feb 1, 2005 #5
    6 x 10^14 perhaps?

    How could i cock it up that much? TWICE! But I see the logic now.
    Thankyou.
     
  7. Feb 1, 2005 #6
    [tex] f = \frac{v}{\lambda} [/tex] where [tex] v [/tex] is speed and [tex] \lambda [/tex] is wavelength.
     
  8. Feb 1, 2005 #7

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Read the sticky post on LaTEX typesetting.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Stupid question sorry
  1. Stupid question (Replies: 1)

  2. Stupid question (Replies: 3)

  3. Stupid question but (Replies: 7)

  4. Stupid Question (Replies: 6)

  5. Stupid question (Replies: 2)

Loading...