A SU(2)_V, SU(2)_A transformations

bob2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Within my project thesis I stumbled over the term SU(2)_V, SU(2)_A transformations. Although I know U(1)_V, U(1)_A transformations from the left and right handed quarks( U(1)_V transformations transform left and right handed quarks the same way, while U(1)_A transformations transform them with a phase which just differs by a minus sign) I have no idea what vectorial /axial stands for in the SU(2) context.
Thank you again so much in advance,
Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easier to explain with the corresponding Lie algebras, i.e., for "infinitesimal transformations". You start with the ##\mathrm{SU}(2)_L \times \mathrm{SU(2)_R## transformations, which act independently on the left and right-handed parts of the Dirac spinor
$$\psi_R=\frac{1+\gamma^5}{2}, \quad \psi_L=\frac{1-\gamma_5}{2}.$$

An arbitrary infinitesimal transformation acts like
$$\delta \psi_R = \delta \vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{\tau} \psi_R, \quad \delta \psi_L=\delta \vec{\beta} \cdot \vec{\tau} \psi_L,$$
where ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{\sigma}/2## with the Pauli matrices acting in spinor space.
Now you can decompose these infinitesimal transformation in a different, i.e., in one that acts in the same way on both the left and the right handed component and one that acts differently. To that end we write
$$\delta \psi = \mathrm{i} \delta \vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{\tau} \frac{1+\gamma^5}{2} \psi + \mathrm{i} \delta \vec{\beta}| \cdot \vec{\tau}_L \frac{1-\gamma^5}{2} \psi =
\frac{\mathrm{i}}{2} (\delta \vec{\alpha}+\delta \vec{\beta}) \cdot \vec{\tau} \psi + \frac{\mathrm{i}}{2} (\delta \vec{\alpha}-\delta \vec{\beta}) \gamma^5 \psi.$$
Now define
$$\delta \vec{\alpha}_V=\frac{1}{2} (\delta \vec{\alpha}+\delta \vec{\beta}), \quad \delta \vec{\alpha}_A=\frac{1}{2} (\delta \vec{\alpha}+\delta \vec{\beta})$$
Then the transformation reads
$$\delta \psi = \mathrm{i} (\delta \vec{\alpha}_V \cdot \vec{\tau}_V + \delta \vec{\alpha}_A \cdot \vec{\tau}_A) \psi, \quad \vec{\tau}_V=\vec{\tau}, \quad \vec{\tau}_A=\vec{\tau} \gamma^5.$$
Note that the ##\vec{\tau}_V## build an su(2) subalgebra (and it's exponential thus an SU(2) subgroup) of the chiral group, while the ##\vec{\tau}_A## don't form a sub algebra/group but a rest class of the group.

If you have a chirally symmetric theory (of then necessarily massless fermions), the corresponding Noether currents are
$$\vec{j}_V^{\mu} = \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \vec{\tau} \psi, \quad j_A^{\mu} = \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \vec{\tau} \gamma^5 \psi,$$
which are vectors and axial vectors under space reflections, respectively and both are isovectors.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top