Subgroup of a symmetric group Sn

leonamccauley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if G is a subgroup of a symmetric group Sn, then either every element of G is an even permutation or else exactly half the elements of G are even permutations.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


We have a hint for the problem. If all the elements of G are even, then there is nothing to prove. That is clear because even times even will yield and even number of permutations so there is closure under multiplication.
And if you have even transposition the inverse of it will be in the set as well so clearly if we have an even number of permutations its a subgroup.

If it is not we are to let e, o(1), 0(2),...o(k-1) be the even elements of G..

I am stuck so i looked at S3 a subgroup of S9. S3 has 6 elements.
(1 3 2) (1 2 3) and e are even
(1 2) (1 3) and (2 3) are odd
So exactly half like the theorem states but i am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, let G be a subgroup of Sn. Let Godd be the subset of G consisting of all odd permutations, and let Geven be the subset of G consisting of all even permutation.

Try to show first that Geven is a subgroup of G (this is somewhat analogous with what you've shown so far).

There are two possibilities:
1) Godd is empty: then G consists only out of even permutation, this is what we wanted to show.

2) There exists an \sigma\in G_{odd}. Now try to show that G_{odd}=\{\sigma\tau~\vert~\tau \in G_{even}\}. Or in more highbrow terminology: Geven acts on Godd, and the orbit of an element in Godd is entire Godd.
 
Or maybe just note that if o is an odd member of G and G is a subgroup then oG=G. How does multiplication by o affect the oddness and evenness of members of G?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top