Which of the directions of implication can you show, if any? The result follows from the definitions of all the words involved directly.
#3
zmdeez
2
0
i have sketched a couple ideas but i don't think they are legit...so i guess i can't show either direction, I am sure one is far simpler than the other i just can't get a good start
What is (your) definition of a vector subspace? Mine is that W is a subspace if W is a subset of V and for all x and y in W and s and t in R (or whatever the underlying field is, perhaps C) the sx+ty is in W and 0 is in W. (note this is redundant by settinf s=t=0)
What is the span of a subset? iti s the set of all combinations
t_1x_1+\ldots t_nx_n
for t_i in R (or the underlying field) and x_i in W
so W=span(W) means exactly that all finite combinations of elements of W are in W.
so we are trying to show that
W closed under combining (adding up) two elements of itself if and only if W is closed under combining a finite number of elements of itself.
Obvioulsy one way is simple: if i can add up any number of combinations of elements then i can in particular add up two of them. Conversely...?
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:##
I came across the following solution online:
Questions:
1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##"
2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho.
In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states
"Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels).
Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product
$$
\langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$
where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...