Subspace Addition: Understanding the Union of A and B

moonbeam
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to know if subspace A + subspace B is the same as the "union of A and B".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moonbeam said:
I just wanted to know if subspace A + subspace B is the same as the "union of A and B".

I never seen this notation. It does not really make sense because the union of two suspaces is never a subspace unless one is contained in the other. Perhaps, it means the set of all sums, each one from each subspace.
 
Ok, subspaces of \mathbb{R}^3 have the following properties: contain the zero vector, are closed under addition, and are closed under multiplication. Am I right?
So, say A, B, and C are subspaces of \mathbb{R}^3. Then, what would (A+B) \cap C mean?
 
moonbeam said:
Ok, subspaces of \mathbb{R}^3 have the following properties: contain the zero vector, are closed under addition, and are closed under multiplication. Am I right?
So, say A, B, and C are subspaces of \mathbb{R}^3. Then, what would (A+B) \cap C mean?

As per the definition of intersection, (A+B) \cap C is the set of all vectors that are both in A+B and in C.
 
moonbeam said:
I just wanted to know if subspace A + subspace B is the same as the "union of A and B".

Not in general.
But A+B always includes AUB.
In fact, span(AUB) = A+B.

moonbeam said:
So, say A, B, and C are subspaces of \mathbb{R}^3. Then, what would (A+B) \cap C mean?

It would mean that you have in your hands a subspace of R^3.
 
Last edited:
As pointed out in the posts above, one only has to go through definitions: for two subspaces A, B of V, you have A + B = [A U B] = {a + b : a \in A, b \in B}.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top