Subspaces of Functions- Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying which sets are subspaces of the function space F[R] = {f | f: R --> R}. The sets under consideration are U, V, S, and T. It is concluded that sets S (f(x) = f(-x)) and V (f(1) + f(2) = 0) are subspaces, while U (f(-1)f(1) = 0) is not due to failure in closure under addition. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of verifying closure and other axioms to prove a set is a subspace.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with function notation and operations.
  • Knowledge of closure properties and axioms of vector spaces.
  • Ability to construct mathematical proofs, particularly in the context of linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the axioms of vector spaces to understand the requirements for subspaces.
  • Learn how to prove closure under addition and scalar multiplication in vector spaces.
  • Explore examples of subspaces in function spaces, particularly polynomial functions.
  • Practice writing formal proofs in linear algebra to solidify understanding of subspace criteria.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of function spaces and subspace criteria.

1LastTry
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following are subspaces of F[R] = {f |f:R-->R}?
a) U = {f e F[R]|f(-1)f(1)=0
b) V = " |f(1)+f(2)=0
c) S = " |f(x)=f(-x)
d) T = " |f(1)<= 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got S and V or c) and b), is that correct?

I thought U or a) would be too, but just found out that it is not closed under addition:
Lets say if: f(1)=2 f(-1)=0 whose product is 0, however another possibility is f(1)=0 f(-1)=a number (non-zero), so if you add them it would not be in V (2+0, 0 + a number) whose product would not be zero. Am I correct?

I somehow know whether it is in the subspace or not, but no idea how to write a proof. How do I show it? Do I do as I typed above, like with actual number examples? or do I have to do it with symbols? ex. (f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) there closed under addition...like that?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To show its NOT a vector space, what you've done suffices (although I'm not following your notations of those 4 sets). You only need one counterexample: so showing its not closed under addition suffices.

To show that something IS a vector space (subspace in this case) however, is much harder. You must verify the 10 (if my memory serves me) axioms for vector space. But since you're trying to show its a subspace, many of these follow directly from U,V,S, and T inheriting their operations from F[r].
As you mentioned, closure does not follow trivially (like associativity does). So go over the axioms of vector fields to see which ones don't follow trivially, and you must write a proof for each of these.

For instance, if you think something IS a subspace, one of the things you must show is closure (as you've mentioned). So let 2 arbitrary elements be in your (supposed) subspace, and show that their 'sum' is in your subspace. Then take another arbitrary element in your subspace and show that its 'scalar product' is in your subspace. Then conclude that since the elements were arbitrarily chosen, closure holds for ALL elements of the subspace.

You must do this for all of the axioms!

Good luck! Hope this helps!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K