Sugars Question: Is Galactose Formed from Glucose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattg443
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When glucose is dissolved in water, it exists in equilibrium between its alpha and beta isomers due to the rotation of the end carbon. The discussion raises the possibility of middle carbon rotation leading to the formation of galactose, which differs from glucose only in the positioning of hydroxyl (OH) groups. However, it is clarified that carbon rotation alone is insufficient to convert glucose into galactose, as the difference involves chiral carbons. Additionally, a question is posed about the reducing sugars test using Benedict's solution, specifically regarding the source of hydroxide ions (OH-) in the reaction, which are derived from the self-ionization of water. The inquiry reflects a basic understanding of carbohydrate chemistry and the chemistry of reducing sugars.
mattg443
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi.

When glucose is dissolved into water it forms d-glucose where it is equilibrium with its alpha and beta glucose isomers since the end carbon can rotate. (yes?)

Just wondering if it was possible that some of the middle carbons rotated and then some galactose was produced (since it differs only in the position of OH groups in the ring).

Any thoughts?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Carbon rotation is not enough to change one into another.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, it is a chiral carbon.
 
Okay, haven't come across that yet. But thanks.
Another related question - in the reducing sugars test, using beddedicts solution, the reaction involves OH- ions, yet Bennidicts solution is CuSO4. Do the OH- ions come from the self ionisation of water?
Thanks (im only in high school, so sorry if my questions seem basic (pun not intended))
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top