Sum to infinity of Heaviside function

joriarty
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I'm revising my course text for my exam and came across a Fourier series problem finding the Fourier series of the square wave:

[PLAIN]http://img574.imageshack.us/img574/5862/eq1.png.

It is then calculated that the complex Fourier coefficients are

[PLAIN]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/5863/eq2.png

with no intermediary calculations provided.

What I don't understand is how they got:

[PLAIN]http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1776/eq3y.png

Could someone please explain? Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the integration range and then at the definition of f again. Then you should see it. Drawing f could also help.
 
I'm still not getting it. Plotting f(t) I get a series of step functions as expected where f(t) = 1 from t = 0 to pi (ie where n = 0), zero from pi to 2*pi (ie where n = 1), one from 2*pi to 3*pi (n = 2) and so on.

But I don't see how this infinite series can be equated to 1 - H(t - pi) which is just equal to 1 from t = 0 to pi and zero elsewhere. That's equivalent to f(t) summed from n = 0 to 0.
 
U do Fourier transform for periodic functions. F is periodic with period 2Pi. So in the integration range f is just 1-H...
 
joriarty said:
I'm still not getting it. Plotting f(t) I get a series of step functions as expected where f(t) = 1 from t = 0 to pi (ie where n = 0), zero from pi to 2*pi (ie where n = 1), one from 2*pi to 3*pi (n = 2) and so on.

If you are integrating from 0 to 2pi, you don't care what happens from 2*pi to 3*pi and so on.

But I don't see how this infinite series can be equated to 1 - H(t - pi) which is just equal to 1 from t = 0 to pi and zero elsewhere. That's equivalent to f(t) summed from n = 0 to 0.

They don't appear to be claiming anything about the entire series, just about it's behavior on [0,2\pi].
 
Ah, I get it now. Thanks guys
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top