I Summation for extended binomial coefficients

Astudious
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Is there a way of writing summation(s) to obtain the extended binomial coefficients?

i.e., Considering the expansion of (1+x+x^2+x^3+...+x^N)^M

can we write expressions (presumably involving summation and/or product notation) for the coefficients (on x^j in the expansion of the above, for each integer j from j=0 to j=NM, i.e. each of the NM+1 non-0 coefficients) without expanding the polynomial by hand?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, you can use the formula

##(x_{0}+\cdots +x_{N})^{M}=\sum_{\alpha_{0}+\ldots +\alpha_{N}=M}\frac{N!}{\alpha_{0}!\cdots \alpha_{N}! }x_{0}^{\alpha_{0}}\cdots x_{N}^{\alpha_{N}}##

now setting ##x_{i}=x^{i}## for every ##i=0,...,N## you obtain the expansion and you can see if it is possible to simplify the index notation in order to find the coefficients ...
 
I can at least start you in a direction that might take you where you want to go:

Consider <br /> 2^{n}=(1+1)^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> n \\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}1^{n-k}1^{k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> n \\<br /> k\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />. Thus, putting x=1 in your formula would give you a start?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top