Summation Limits: Understanding When a>b

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Summation
AI Thread Summary
When evaluating a summation \(\sum_{r=a}^{b}\) with \(a > b\), interpretations vary. One common view is that the summation equals zero, as there are no integers \(n\) satisfying \(a \leq n \leq b\). Others suggest that it could be interpreted differently, similar to integrals, where reversing limits changes the sign. The context of the application can influence the interpretation, particularly in finite calculus. Ultimately, the treatment of such summations depends on the specific mathematical context in which they arise.
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

If we get a summation \sum_{r=a}^{b}, where a > b, how to treat this summation?

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it is official notation, but I think it is usually interpret it as just

\sum_{r = b}^a
 
Really? I'd interpret it as 0. That is, I take
\sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
as shorthand for
\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z},a\le n\le b}f(n)
 
CRGreathouse said:
Really? I'd interpret it as 0. That is, I take
\sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
as shorthand for
\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z},a\le n\le b}f(n)

What is zero, the whole summation, or the index r?
 
saeddawoud said:
What is zero, the whole summation, or the index r?

The whole summation.

To perform a sum, you start with zero, then for each value of n that satisfies the condition specified, you add f(n). In this case, there are no such values of n, so the answer remains zero.

That's my interpretation at least. But there may be other opinions.

Incidentally, some computer languages such as C work similarly. A loop of the form for(n=10; n<0; n++) is never executed.
 
Most of the time, it's best to assume the summation is zero, but it really depends on your application. If a sum like this pops up somewhere for some reason, you should interpret it in context to see if it makes sense at all.

In some cases, for instance in finite calculus, it might be more useful to interpret it slightly differently. It is well known that

\int_a^b f(x) dx = -\!\!\!\int_b^a f(x) dx,

and since integrals are sort of like infinite sums, perhaps sums should work similarly. If a &lt; b &lt; c, we have

\sum_{k = a}^b f(k) + \sum_{k = b + 1}^c f(k) = \sum_{k = a}^c f(k).

It might be nice to extend this to cases other than a &lt; b &lt; c. For example, we would have

\sum_{k = a}^{b - 1} f(k) + \sum_{k = b}^a f(k) = \sum_{k = a}^a f(k) = f(a),

which would imply that

\sum_{k = b}^a = f(a) - \sum_{k = a}^{b - 1} = -\!\!\!\sum_{k = a + 1}^{b - 1}.

We would then have

\sum_{k = a}^{a - 1} f(k) = 0,

but

\sum_{k = a}^{a - 2} f(k) = -f(a - 1).

Which interpretation you should choose is up to the application.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top