Summation Limits: Understanding When a>b

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Summation
AI Thread Summary
When evaluating a summation \(\sum_{r=a}^{b}\) with \(a > b\), interpretations vary. One common view is that the summation equals zero, as there are no integers \(n\) satisfying \(a \leq n \leq b\). Others suggest that it could be interpreted differently, similar to integrals, where reversing limits changes the sign. The context of the application can influence the interpretation, particularly in finite calculus. Ultimately, the treatment of such summations depends on the specific mathematical context in which they arise.
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

If we get a summation \sum_{r=a}^{b}, where a > b, how to treat this summation?

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it is official notation, but I think it is usually interpret it as just

\sum_{r = b}^a
 
Really? I'd interpret it as 0. That is, I take
\sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
as shorthand for
\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z},a\le n\le b}f(n)
 
CRGreathouse said:
Really? I'd interpret it as 0. That is, I take
\sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
as shorthand for
\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z},a\le n\le b}f(n)

What is zero, the whole summation, or the index r?
 
saeddawoud said:
What is zero, the whole summation, or the index r?

The whole summation.

To perform a sum, you start with zero, then for each value of n that satisfies the condition specified, you add f(n). In this case, there are no such values of n, so the answer remains zero.

That's my interpretation at least. But there may be other opinions.

Incidentally, some computer languages such as C work similarly. A loop of the form for(n=10; n<0; n++) is never executed.
 
Most of the time, it's best to assume the summation is zero, but it really depends on your application. If a sum like this pops up somewhere for some reason, you should interpret it in context to see if it makes sense at all.

In some cases, for instance in finite calculus, it might be more useful to interpret it slightly differently. It is well known that

\int_a^b f(x) dx = -\!\!\!\int_b^a f(x) dx,

and since integrals are sort of like infinite sums, perhaps sums should work similarly. If a &lt; b &lt; c, we have

\sum_{k = a}^b f(k) + \sum_{k = b + 1}^c f(k) = \sum_{k = a}^c f(k).

It might be nice to extend this to cases other than a &lt; b &lt; c. For example, we would have

\sum_{k = a}^{b - 1} f(k) + \sum_{k = b}^a f(k) = \sum_{k = a}^a f(k) = f(a),

which would imply that

\sum_{k = b}^a = f(a) - \sum_{k = a}^{b - 1} = -\!\!\!\sum_{k = a + 1}^{b - 1}.

We would then have

\sum_{k = a}^{a - 1} f(k) = 0,

but

\sum_{k = a}^{a - 2} f(k) = -f(a - 1).

Which interpretation you should choose is up to the application.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top